Requirement ownership
Map each requirement to a control, owner and accountable approval authority.
For suppliers serving defence and other high-assurance customers, cybersecurity can become a condition of doing business. Requirements differ by contract, customer and jurisdiction. Akita helps translate them into working controls, gap reduction and evidence that stands up to scrutiny.

Contract clauses, customer requirements and the applicable framework must be established for each relationship. ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials and CMMC may be relevant in different markets; they do not apply to every supplier.
Prioritise identity, endpoint security, secure configuration, supplier access, incident readiness and safe information handling. Controls should be demonstrable, not merely described in policy.
Map each requirement to a control, owner and accountable approval authority.
Identify the current evidence, missing artifacts, open gaps and deadlines.
Use expressly scoped checks when an assessor needs evidence beyond an assertion.
An initial review can establish applicable requirements, assess available evidence and identify high-priority remediation. Agree practical outputs such as a requirement matrix, control inventory and ownership-based action plan.
Security obligations must make business sense and implementation must be technically testable. Akita connects governance decisions with the controls that support them.
No certification or accreditation is implied. Readiness support is not a substitute for a separate accredited assessment.
No. Customer, contract and jurisdiction determine applicability.
Yes. We can review known controls and evidence gaps without claiming to know future contract requirements.
Tell us what your customer or tender requires and where evidence is missing.