Akita Cyber Security

AI & Agentic Security

Secure AI systems, agents and MCP-style integrations before autonomy turns assumptions into actions.

Conceptual cloud environment artwork
Conceptual agent process from context through practical actionAKITA / AGENCY UNDER CONTROL
What you get

Keep autonomous systems inside accountable boundaries.

AI and agent threat modelling
Tool, connector and MCP-style trust-boundary review
Agent identity and permission design
Prompt, data and action-path abuse testing
Human-approval, logging and containment controls
How the engagement works

From agent autonomy to observable security controls.

01

Map agency

Identify what the model or agent can see, decide, call and change.

02

Challenge

Test misuse paths across prompts, tools, identities, data and connected systems.

03

Constrain

Design least-agency permissions, approval points, telemetry and containment.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do you test LLM prompt attacks?

Yes, where relevant, but the scope also covers the surrounding tools, identities, data and action paths.

What is different about agent security?

The system can take actions, so permissions, tool boundaries and oversight matter as much as model behaviour.

Can this support secure MCP use?

Yes. Connector trust, tool exposure, identity, secrets and allowed actions can all be assessed.

Validation in practice

Explore how attack-path testing can focus remediation on the risks that matter.
READY TO DEFINE THE WORK?

Already have an AI security requirement or draft scope? Send it to Akita for a focused scoping conversation.

Request a scope or proposal ↗